Automatic Vehicle Location:
Rural Transit
September 2007

Benefits and Costs


Benefits
  • Kansas City achieved reduced incident-response time, from 7-15 to 2-3 minutes, with use of AVL.
  • Ann Arbor saw voice-radio traffic reduced by 70% with use of AVL and MDTs.
  • London (Ontario) saved $45,000 annually by eliminating manual schedule adherence checking.
  • Collects driver log for use by payroll.
  • Provides graphic or tabular report of vehicle activity (i.e., dwell time, speed).
  • Sweetwater County, WY, almost doubled ridership without increasing dispatching staff by implementing AVL and CADS. Operating expenses decreased 50% per passenger mile.
  • AVL and CADS allowed St. John's County Council on Aging in Augustine, FL, to reduce its scheduling, dispatching, and billing staff by half. Trips per vehicle hour have increased from 0.5 to 2.5.
  • Collects driver log for use by payroll.
  • Provides graphic or tabular report of vehicle activity (i.e., dwell time, speed).


Photo of rural transit buses.
Rural transit buses.
(Photo courtesy of City of Colvis, California)
Photo of a bus pulling up to a bus stop.

Costs
Product Cost

Onboard GPS equipment ranges from $500 to $2,000 per vehicle; complete implementation costs (including control center hardware, installation, and training) range from $ 4,000 to $10,000 per vehicle. Required upgrades to communications systems can add significant costs. Additional ITS applications (CADS, real-time traveler information systems, automatic passenger counters (APC), automatic fare cards (AFC), video surveillance, silent alarms) are not included in these costs.

Operations and Maintenance

AVL alone provides limited operational savings. It facilitates communications and reporting and can improve systems planning. More significant savings are seen with the addition of CADS, which provides the ability to serve more customers with existing resources. Additional technology specialists are often needed to develop, manage, and maintain ITS systems. Consultants and manufacturers can provide some technical assistance, but in-house staff are more effective for all but the smallest agencies.



Previous page   Next page