Intelligent Transportation Systems

T3 Webinar:

Lessons Learned Implementing Multi-Jurisdictional Transit Signal Priority Systems: King County Metro Transit and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

January 22, 2008

Text version of Webinar presentation:

"Lessons Learned Implementing Multi-Jurisdictional Transit Signal Priority Systems: King County Metro Transit and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority"

Description of image or images on a slide contained in brackets.

Back to Webinar Files

Slide 1: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)

Metro’s Countywide Signal Priority Program
T3 Webinar
January 22, 2008

Slide 2: Background

In the late 90’s, Metro funded several transit signal priority demonstrations

  • City of Los Angeles
  • City of Glendale
  • City of Lancaster
  • City of Santa Monica
  • Metro

Slide 3: Metro’s Bus Signal Priority Pilot Project

  • Initiated in January 1999

  • Multijurisdictional effort aimed at
    • minimizing delay experienced by buses and
    • shortening round trip running times
  • Develop a preferred signal priority solution for high-ridership corridors traversing multiple jurisdictions with different local traffic control equipment and software

Slide 4: Los Angeles County

  • 89 jurisdictions
  • 43 public agencies providing fixed route bus service
  • Metro alone operates 191 bus routes with over 1.3 million weekday boardings on average

[Map of Los Angeles County and its 89 jurisdictions.]

Slide 5: Program Context, cont’d

Los Angeles County

  • 1,433 square miles in Metro service area
    • City of Los Angeles = 466 sq. miles
  • 88 other jurisdictions = 967 sq. miles
  • Over 10,000 traffic signals

[Photos of signal controllers.]

back to top

Slide 6: Program Funding

  • Local
    • Proposition C: ½-cent sales tax used to maintain, improve and expand public transit as well as reduce congestion and increase mobility in LA County
  • Federal
  • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds through FTA

[Pie chart that shows transit funding stems from two sources: local (Proposition ) and Federal (CMAQ funds through FTA).]

Slide 7: Program Funding

  • Bus Signal Priority Pilot Project: $4.3 million
  • Metro Rapid Countywide Signal Priority Expansion
    • Phase 1: $7.5 million
    • Phase 2: $8.7 million (estimate)

Slide 8: Study Tour

Locations

  • Portland Tri-Met
  • KITSAP Transit
  • King County Metro

[Map that shows location of study tours.]

Slide 9: Study Tour Objectives

  • Evaluate different signal priority technology solutions implemented by various transit properties
  • Study the institutional, political, legal, and financial issues
  • Assess systems integration complexities
  • Review adopted signal priority implementation guidelines
  • Discuss "lessons learned"

Slide 10: King County Metro Transit Peer Review

  • Multiple jurisdictions
  • Several different traffic signal control hardware types
  • Multiple firmware interfaces
  • Decision to grant priority made at the local control level
  • Headway intervals were similar to ours
  • Local traffic engineering control

Slide 11: Countywide Signal Priority Pilot Project

  • Crenshaw Corridor
    • 10.5 miles
    • Adams Blvd. to Redondo Beach Blvd.
    • 54 Signalized Intersections
    • 51 signal-priority- equipped
    • Jurisdictional Partners
    • City of Los Angeles
    • City of Inglewood
    • County of Los Angeles
    • Unincorporated County areas, City of Gardena and City of Hawthorne

[Map that shows location of the Crenshaw Corridor. ]

Slide 12: Countywide Signal Priority Evaluation Results

  • Average Bus Travel Time
    • Up to 8.8% reduction - northbound PM peak
    • Up to 4.2% reduction - southbound AM peak
  • Average Delay Due to Red Signals
    • Up to 22.5% reduction - northbound PM peak
    • Up to 12.5% reduction - southbound AM peak

[Photo of a Metro Rapid bus. ]

back to top

Slide 13: Countywide Signal Priority Process

[Image that shows Bus-to-Intersection Communications. Communications flows from the vehicle” to the decision to request priority (DTRP) [both on-bus system functions] onto decision to grant priority (DTRP) and implement priority (both traffic signal controller functions). ]

Slide 14: Countywide Signal Priority WLAN Equipment

[Slide shows diagram of the Countywide Signal Priority WLAN Equipment. The diagram shows the bus (the mobile client) navigating through different access points along the corridor. ]

Slide 15: Countywide Signal Priority On-Bus Equipment

[Photos of on-bus signal priority equipment. ]

Slide 16: Countywide Signal Priority Technologies

  • On-Bus Equipment
  • Intersection Check-In Technologies
  • Intersection Controller Equipment

Slide 17: Countywide Signal Priority Technologies

  • On-Bus Equipment
  • Intersection Check-In Technologies
  • Intersection Controller Equipment

Slide 18: Countywide Signal Priority WLAN Equipment

[Photos of signal priority WLAN equipment. ]

Slide 19: Countywide Signal Priority WLAN Equipment

[Additional photos of signal priority WLAN equipment. ]

Slide 20: Countywide Signal Priority Traffic Signal Integration

[Photos of signal controllers. ]

Slide 21: Countywide Signal Priority Traffic Signal Integration

[Photos of signal priority depot WLAN equipment. ]

Slide 22: Countywide Signal Priority Expansion Phase I

[Map that shows location of Expansion Phase I of LA Countywide Signal Priority system. ]

Slide 23: Countywide Signal Priority Expansion Phase II

[Map that shows location of Expansion Phase II of LA Countywide Signal Priority system. ]

Slide 24: Countywide Signal Priority Expansion

[Map that shows location of LA Countywide Signal Priority system after Phase I and II are completed. ]

Slide 25: Multijurisdictional Project Implementation: Challenges and Lessons Learned

  • Project Oversight and Coordination
    • Allocation of necessary staff resources
    • Project schedule to accommodate jurisdictional coordination Issues
  • Consensus Building
    • Schedule/time management
    • No "One size fits all" approach
    • Management, administrative, and technical staff must all be included in the decision making process
    • Work with your jurisdictional partners both collectively and individually to resolve implementation questions and concerns

Slide 26: Multijurisdictional Project Implementation: Challenges and Lessons Learned

  • Legal Agreements
    • Respective legal counsels and technical staff must coordinate with one another to address legal concerns
    • Project scope, roles and responsibilities, on-going operations and maintenance, cooperation, communications, and liability are key elements
    • Legal impasse can become a showstopper
    • Corridor Synchronization
    • Signal timing update

Slide 27: Multijurisdictional Project Implementation: Challenges and Lessons Learned

  • Technology Migration
    • Work with participating jurisdictions to ensure system- upgrade compatibility
    • Develop an operations and maintenance plan that accommodates potential hardware and software upgrades
    • Continually evaluate the existing system and look for opportunities to improve performance

Slide 28: Contact Information

Steven Y. Gota
Transportation Planning Manager
San Gabriel Valley Area Team
LA Metro
One Gateway Plaza
Mail Stop: 99-22-8
Los Angeles, CA  90012-2952

213-922-3043
GOTAS@metro.net

Reinland Jones
Transportation Planner
San Gabriel Valley Area Team
Los Angeles County Metro
One Gateway Plaza
Mail Stop: 99-22-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952
 
213-922-2231
JONESRE@metro.net


back to top